The court disposed of the second appeal and granted the civil application because the sale-deed dated 14th July 2014 was undisputed, leading to the prior disposal of Special Darkhast No. 43/1994.
Civil Application allowed; Second Appeal disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10172 OF 2014 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.750 OF 2003
Sadashiv Ramkrishna Pathak died through L.Rs. Shalini and ors.
.. Applicants
Versus
Vijaya Devidas Upasani and anr.
.. Respondents
Mr Amol Sawant, Advocate for applicants Mr S.P.Brahme, Advocate for respondents 1 and 2
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 16th January 2015
PER COURT :
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
vvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the application to dispose of the pending second appeal given the disposal of the underlying Special Darkhast.
Whether the sale-deed dated 14th July 2014 being undisputed justifies the disposal of the second appeal and the Civil Application.
Sadashiv Ramkrishna Pathak and L.Rs. Shalini and ors.
Vijaya Devidas Upasani
Respondent 2
N.W. SAMBRE
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
