Single-line order dismissing a criminal revision application citing reasons to be recorded separately with no substantive legal content.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mhi
1
REVN-280-12.sxw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 280 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr. Rahul Kadam for the applicant.
Ms. Tejasweta Bhosale h/f. Mr. Rahul S. Kate for respondent No.1.
Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar,APP, for the State.
CORAM :SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV , J DATE :15th September, 2015.
P.C.:-
For the reasons to be recorded separately, Revision Application is dismissed.
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J)
1/2
Mhi
REVN-280-12.sxw
2
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
2/2
Mr. Rahul Kadam
Respondent No.1
The State
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
