Review Application No. 79 of 2010 filed challenging Writ Petition No. 437 of 2009 was dismissed in default after the applicant failed to appear in the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Bench.
dismissed in default due to absence
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) R. A. No. 79 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Review Application No. 79 of 2010 (In Writ Petition No. 437 of 2009)
Manik s/o. Ambadas Labade, Age : 70 years, Occupation : Nil, R/o. Near Bus Stand, Tuljapur, Taluka : Tuljapur, District : Osmanabad, Through its G.P.A., Ramesh s/o. Manik Labade, Age : 42 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. As above. .. Applicant.
versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Osmanabad, & 2 others. .. Respondent.
Mr. K.S. Bhore & Mr. P.N. Surwase, Advocate, for the applicant (Both absent).
Mr. S.K. Kadam, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2.
Mr. K.K. Kulkarni, Advocate, for respondent no.3.
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 22ND JUNE 2015
R. A. No. 79 of 2010
PER COURT :
None present for the review applicant when the matter is called out. Hence, the Review Application is dismissed in default.
( A.M. BADAR ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
Puranik/ RA79.10
Manik s/o. Ambadas Labade
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
