This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Review Application No. 141 of 2010 in WRIT PETITION NO. 7835 OF 2006
Ganesh s/o Shankar Irmale
Applicant
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Mr. A.B. Chalak, Advocate holding for
Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. D.V. Tele, A.P.P. for respondent nos.1 & 5/State
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE &
A. M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 25th JUNE, 2015
PER COURT :
1.Learned counsel appearing for the applicant
says that despite contacts with the applicant, he has
not given any instructions for prosecuting the
application. In view this, review application stands
dismissed.
( A.M. BADAR, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
SRM/25/6/15
Ganesh s/o Shankar Irmale
The State of Maharashtra
A. V. Nirgude
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court