A single-paragraph review application under Writ Petition No. 348 of 2008 was rejected by the High Court as the impugned order was on merits and unassailable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) R. A. No. 120 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Review Application No. 120 of 2008 (In Writ Petition No. 348 of 2008)
Venkat s/o. Maroti Gangalwad, Age : 53 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Chadola, Taluka : Mukhed, District : Nanded.
.. Applicant
(Original petitioner)
versus
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, .. Respondents & 3 others. (Original respondents)
Mr. Pratap V. Jadhavar, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. S.K. Kadam, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2.
Mr. P.S. Patil, Advocate, for respondent nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 24TH JUNE 2015
PER COURT :
(2) R. A. No. 120 of 2008
( A.M. BADAR ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
Puranik/ RA120.08
Venkat s/o. Maroti Gangalwad
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
