IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
Leave to withdraw public interest litigation petitions was granted; matters disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil9715.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.97 OF 2015
Jalgaon Zilla Adiwasi Malhar, Mahadev, Tokare Koli Shetmajoor Mahasangh, Jalgaon Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.98 OF 2015 Jalgaon Zilla Adiwasi Malhar, Mahadev, Tokare Koli Shetmajoor Mahasangh, Jalgaon Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.99 OF 2015 Jalgaon Zilla Adiwasi Malhar, Mahadev, Tokare Koli Shetmajoor Mahasangh, Jalgaon Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.100 OF 2015 Jalgaon Zilla Adiwasi Malhar, Mahadev, Tokare Koli Shetmajoor Mahasangh, Jalgaon Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.101 OF 2015
{2} pil9715.odt Jalgaon Zilla Adiwasi Malhar, Mahadev, Tokare Koli Shetmajoor Mahasangh, Jalgaon Petitioner Versus
State of Maharashtra & others Respondents
Mr.A.S.Golegaonkar, advocate with Mr.M.A.Golegaonkar, advocate for the petitioner Mr. P.S.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 13th October, 2015
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation Petitions.
Leave granted. Instant PILs are disposed of as withdrawn.
P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/pil9715
Jalgaon Zilla Adiwasi Malhar, Mahadev, Tokare Koli Shetmajoor Mahasangh, Jalgaon
State of Maharashtra & others
R.M.BORDE
P.R.BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
