Feeedom Firm v. Commissioner of Police, Pune and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court ordered the registry to amend the cause title of this PIL to a Criminal Public Interest Litigation and place it on the Appellate Side for future listing.
The Court ordered the registry to amend the cause title of this PIL to a Criminal Public Interest Litigation and place it on the Appellate Side for future listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL136.13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 136 OF 2013
Freedom Firm ... Petitioners Vs The Commissioner of Police, Pune & Ors. ... Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. A.B. Vagyani, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, CJ & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
THURSDAY, 22 JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
CHIEF JUSTICE
B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.
SRP 1/1
Freedom Firm
The Commissioner of Police, Pune
Mohit S. Shah
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court