Petitioners in a writ petition and public interest litigation sought to withdraw both matters based on the government taking steps, leading the court to dispose of the petitions as withdrawn and not pressed respectively.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 122/2015 & PIL 11/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No.122 of 2015 With Civil Application No.2143 of 2015 With Civil Application No.2144 of 2015
Jagdamba Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Beed, District Beed And Other.
.. Petitioners.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. Mahesh S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for petitioners.
Shri. V.D. Godbharle, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
Shri. Prakash S. Paranjape, Advocate, for applicants in Civil Application Nos.2143/2015 and 2144/2015.
With
Public Interest Litigation No.11 of 2012 With Criminal Application No.5817 of 2014 And Criminal Application No.6118 of 2014
Prabhakar s/o Sahebrao Nagare. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Others. .. Respondents.
2 WP 122/2015 & PIL 11/2012
Shri. Pradeep Deshmukh, Advocate, holding for Shri. H.A. Joshi, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. V.D. Godbharle, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Shri. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Shri. N.B. Khandare, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 and 6.
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 19th MARCH 2015
ORDER:
3 WP 122/2015 & PIL 11/2012
Sd/- Sd/- (V.M. DESHPANDE, J.) (T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
rsl
Jagdamba Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Beed
State of Maharashtra
Prabhakar s/o Sahebrao Nagare
T.V. NALAWADE
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
