High Court disposed of a testamentary suit via a Notice of Motion on consent terms, accepting signed undertakings between the plaintiff and defendant without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
912-NMT-55-14-TS-176-13.DOC
Sharayu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 55 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 176 OF 2013
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 630 OF 2013
Mr. Karnaditya Neogi…Applicant
In the matter between
Abhimanyu Neogi…Plaintiff
Versus
Mr. Karnaditya Neogi…Defendant
Mr. Himanshu Choudhary, i/b Vigil Juris, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Bhadra N. Dalal, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 24th March 2015
PC:-
1.This Notice of Motion is settled. The parties have arrived at
Consent Terms. These are signed by the parties and their
Advocates. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked
‘X’ for identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are
accepted as undertakings to the court.
1 of 2
912-NMT-55-14-TS-176-13.DOC
2. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in accordance with Consent Terms. No order as to costs.
3. All concerned to act on authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Karnaditya Neogi
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court