Sunder Newandram Awatramani v. Bina Lal Awatramani
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay admitted a Testamentary Petition as a suit and listed the same for framing of issues on a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-NMT-130-14.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 130 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 282 OF 2014
Bina Lal Awatramani…Applicant
In the matter between
Sunder Newandram Awatramani…Plaintiff
Versus
Bina lal Awatramani…Defendant
Mr. Amey Nabar , i/b Hariani & Co., for the Applicant.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:21st January 2015
PC:-
1.For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support, the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.The Affidavit in Support has already been filed. It shall
formally be taken on record.
3. Petition is to be renumbered as Suit.
1 of 2
24-NMT-130-14.DOC
4. List the Suit for framing issues on 4th February 2015.
5. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in these terms. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bina Lal Awatramani
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court