The High Court of Bombay disposed of the notice of motion after recording consent terms filed by parties amicably settling the summary suit. The defendant undertook to make balance payment.
Consent terms dated 3.08.2015 are taken on record and the notice of motion is disposed of in terms thereof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2.nms.505.2015.ss.2136.2010.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 505 OF 2015 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2136 OF 2010
Sumer Corporation .. Applicants (Orig. Defendant)
In the matter between :
Santoshkumar Katwarum Gupta .. Plaintiff Vs. Sumer Corporation .. Defendant
Mr.Ganeshlal Agarchand Kataria for plaintiff.
Mr.Vishal Kanade a/w. Ms.Y. Bhansali i/b Yasmin Bhansali & Co. for defendant.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 3RD AUGUST, 2015
P.C.
consent terms dated 3.08.2015, signed by the sole proprietor of the plaintiff and their respective advocates. The consent terms is taken on record and
marked 'X' for identification. Order in terms of the consent terms.
the balance payment of Rs.10,00,000/- to the plaintiff on or before
1/2
Shraddha Talekar PA
2
2.nms.505.2015.ss.2136.2010.doc
17.08.2015. The Court is considering the statement as an undertaking given by the defendant. Therefore, this undertaking and the undertaking given by
the plaintiff in paragraph 3 is accepted and so ordered.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
2/2
Shraddha Talekar PA
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
