Order received an undertaking from the respondent not to disturb possession of a flat. The Notice of Motion was disposed of accordingly.
The Notice of Motion is disposed of after accepting the Defendant's undertaking not to disturb possession.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-NMS-1450-14.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1450 OF 2014
IN
SUIT NO. 872 OF 2014
Kanchan Dhirajlal Paurana…Applicant
In the matter between
Kanchan Dirajlal Paurana...Plaintiff
Versus
Ajit Shantilal Paurana…Defendants
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar,i/b M/s. Kothari & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Madhusudanan Nair, i/b M/s. KPMC Legal, for the Defendant
No.1.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:18th March 2015
PC:-
1.Heard Mr. Khandeparkar and Mr. Nair, learned Counsel for
the Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 respectively. Perused the Affidavit
in Reply.
2.The statements in paragraphs Nos. 2, 15 and 16 of the
Affidavit in Reply filed by the 1st Defendant, Ajit Shantilal Paurana,
1 of 2
2-NMS-1450-14.DOC
in relation to the possession of the Plaintiff in respect of the Flat
No. 502, Poonam Creek Side CHS Ltd., Plot No. 9, Kishanchand
Marg, Bandra Reclamation, Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050 are
noted, viz., that Defendant No. 1 will not disturb the possession of
the Plaintiff in respect of that flat. These are accepted as statements
and undertakings to the Court.
3. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in these terms.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Kanchan Dhirajlal Paurana
Ajit Shantilal Paurana
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court