This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P5-MPT-92-14-.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1562 OF 2013
Dr. (Mrs.) Pooja Narendrakumar Parmar…Petitioner
Versus
Mrs. Priyanka Karan Bhaskar nee Miss. Priyanka …Respondent.
alias Jasmine Narendrakumar Parmar.
Mr. P.S. Gidwani, for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. Shah, i/b M/s. Lilani Shah & Co., for the Respondent.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 30th October 2015
PC:-
1. Not on board. Mentioned. By consent taken on board.
2.The Miscellaneous Petition is settled. Consent Terms are
tendered. These are signed by the Petitioner, the Respondent and
their respective Advocates. Both parties are present in Court. The
Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for
identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted
as undertakings to the Court.
1 of 2
P5-MPT-92-14-.DOC
3. The Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms, with no order as to costs.
4. In consequence, all ad-interim orders are vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Dr. (Mrs.) Pooja Narendrakumar Parmar
Mrs. Priyanka Karan Bhaskar
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court