This bench allowed an application seeking service of legal process on respondents through their attorney and requested that substituted service by publication also be undertaken.
Application allowed; applicants directed to also take steps for service by substituted service/publication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 248 OF 2014 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 105 OF 2013
MRS. MARIA ROSA JOANITA CRUZ E COSTA FERNANDES @ ROBERT COSTA FERNANDES AND ANR.
... Applicant
Versus
MR. ALBERTO VAS AND 51 ORS.
... Respondent
Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the applicants.
Mr. S. S. Kakodkar, Advocate for the respondent no.22.
Mr. A. Prabhudessai, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent nos.23 and 24.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:2nd July, 2015
P.C.
Heard Shri Menezes, the learned Counsel for the appellants/ applicants and Shri Kakodkar, the learned Counsel for the respondent no.22, Ramrao Lotlikar.
2 MCA/248/2014
nos.19 and 20, gives an authority to employ an Advocate and to contest the legal proceedings.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for effecting service of petitioners on respondents through their attorney through the respondent no.22 is maintainable.
MRS. MARIA ROSA JOANITA CRUZ E COSTA FERNANDES @ ROBERT COSTA FERNANDES AND ANR.
MR. ALBERTO VAS AND 51 ORS
RAMRAO LOTLIKAR
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
