The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of a miscellaneous civil application observing that no abatement arose because a legal representative (widow) was already on record.
The miscellaneous civil application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 234 OF 2015
IN
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2013
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WORKS DIVISION (XXIII). ... Applicant Versus SHRI RAMESH MORTOBA DALVI AND 11 ORS., ... Respondents
Ms. Neha Kholkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. Rosette Pereira, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1(a) to (d), 2 to 9, 11 and 12.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:1st April, 2015
P.C:
Heard Ms. Kholkar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the applicant, and Ms. Pereira, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1(a) to (d), 2 to 9, 11 and 12.
9), is already on record.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
EV
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the death of a legal representative causes abatement in the underlying civil application.
How to correlate the continuation of an underlying civil application with the present miscellaneous application.
Executive Engineer, Works Division (XXIII)
Shri Ramesh Mortoba Dalvi
Respondent No. 9 (Widow)
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
