High Court at Nagpur disposed of an appeal in terms of a compromise arrived at between the parties. The court accepted the undertaking executed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
LPA395-11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
C.A.Z. No. 65 of 2015 in L.P.A.No. 395 of 2011 in
Writ Petition No.4543/2010 (D) ( M.P.V. Contractors, Builders & Developers, Nagpur .vs. The Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur and others. )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. A.K. Choube, Advocate for Appellant Mrs. K.S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.K. Pardhy, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. S.V. Purohit, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Prasanna B. Varale, JJ. DATED : October 9, 2015.
The parties have filed an application for recording the compromise arrived at between the parties.
The application is duly signed by all the parties so also their respective counsel. The parties are present in the Court and they are represented by their respective counsel.
In that view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. Respective undertakings given in the said application are treated as an undertaking given to this Court and are accepted.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
M.P.V. Contractors, Builders & Developers, Nagpur
The Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur
B.R. Gavai
Prasanna B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
