The appeal was dismissed as frivolous, rendered infructuous, and inconsequential due to the passage of time.
No costs awarded. Pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
924 LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2010
SHILABAI RAGHURAJ HARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Suryawanshi Kamlakar J. Smt. VA Shinde, AGP for Respondent/State; Mr. Mohekar Ganesh V., Adv.for Resp No.2.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: January 22, 2015
PER COURT :-
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
BDV
SHILABAI RAGHURAJ HARE
THE STATE OF MAH
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
