Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. Surinder Singh Hanspal
Case brief
What is this about?
mnm IN THE HIGH COURT
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JO.175/2014-EXA.789/2013(9)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE'S ORDER NO. 175 OF 2014 IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 789 OF 2014 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 217 OF 2014
HDFC Bank Limited ...Claimant Vs. Surinder Singh Hanspal ...Respondent
None present for the parties
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 19TH OCTOBER, 2015
P.C. :
- The Judge's Order has been pending since 1st October, 2014. It has been stood over from time to time for the last more than one year. Since order in terms of the Judge's Order as drafted could not be passed the applicant has not sought to amend the Judge's Order or to appear to show the Court how order in terms of the Judge's Order is required to be passed. Hence there shall be no order on this Judge's Order.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Surinder Singh Hanspal
Coram
Roshan Dalvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court