Petitioning creditors filed an insolvency petition. The court noted that the creditors had received full payment via a Supreme Court order. The petition was considered but disposed of without any active order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
inpt 52-2006.doc
1/2
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN INSOLVENCY
INSOLVENCY PETITION NO. 52 OF 2006
RE : Bhupendra Champaklal Devidas ...Debtor
Ex-parte
Nish Patel & Ors.
…Petitioning Creditors
Ms.Mrinalini Rajpal i/b. Dhoijode Associates for Petitioning Creditors.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
6 OCTOBER 2015
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Petitioning Creditors states that in pursuance of an order passed by the Supreme Court in IA 31-33/2010 in Civil Appeal Nos. 296-298 of 2003, the Petitioning Creditors have received payments from the debtor in full and final settlement of the decretal dues. The Petitioning Creditors have no claim now against the debtor in respect of the decree. Learned Counsel does not press the petition.
3 In the premises, the petition is disposed of with no order.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
sat 2/2 inpt 52-2006.doc
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order :
Nish Patel & Ors.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
