In Insolvency Petition No. 8 of 2015, the High Court at Bombay disposed of the petition in the absence of the insolvent despite proper notice.
The insolvent has failed to appear despite notice; the petition is disposed of in accordance with the prayer clauses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
28.inpt.8.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS INSOLVENCY JURISDICTION
INSOLVENCY PETITION NO. 8 OF 2015
Choithram Galomal Sewlani .. Petitioner
Vs.
Navin Gupta & Anr.
.. Respondents
Ms.Kavita S. Lalwani for petitioning creditor
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2015
P.C.
1 The petitioner has filed his affidavit of service affirmed on 28.08.2015 annexing therewith copies of the notice published in the newspapers namely Free Press Journal, Mumbai and Navshakti, Mumbai, both date 17.08.2015. The insolvent has failed to appear despite notice.
3 The Official Assignee to take necessary steps in accordance with law and procedure and to invest the amount so realized from the estate of the insolvent/insolvents Firms with any Nationalized Banks as per the circular issued by the office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
Shraddha Talekar PA
Choithram Galomal Sewlani
Navin Gupta
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
