The Family Court disposed of the first appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the listed dates. The appeal was dismissed without any detailed reasoning or citation of precedents.
The first appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FCA8-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 8/2014
(SHARDA JAWAHARLAL PARIKH & ANOTHER VERSUS KISHOR MANILAL GUJARATI)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : MARCH 26, 2015.
None appeared for the appellants on 10.02.2015. None appears for the appellant, today also.
The first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
SHARDA JAWAHARLAL PARIKH & ANOTHER
KISHOR MANILAL GUJARATI
Vasanti A. Naik
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
