The High Court noted a typographical error in the original judgment regarding the year of a specific Family Court Appeal and directed a correction in the original order and digital upload.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fca105-128
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.105 OF 2008 with
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.128 OF 2008
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Ms Kanak Taparia i/b M/s.Jhangiani, Narula and
Associates for the Appellant in FCA 105/2009 and for
respondent in FCA 128/2008
Ms Manjula Rao for the Respondent in FCA 105/2008 and
for the appellant in FCA 128/2008
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.K.MENON,JJ.
DATE : JULY 10, 2015.
P.C.
1There is a typographical error in
clause (i) of paragraph 135 of the
Judgment delivered in the Family Court
Appeals. The year of Family Court
Appeal No.105 shall be corrected as
2008 instead of 2007. Correction be
carried out to the original order as
well as order uploaded on server.
Ms Kanak Taparia
Ms Manjula Rao
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court