Makrand Damodhar Apte v. Minabai Damodhar Apte
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed due to non-appearance of appellant; appeal abated against respondent to whom compensation was awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fa131-03
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2003
MAKRAND DAMODHAR APTE VERSUS MINABAI DAMODHAR APTE
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
DATED : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2015
ORDER : -
1] On 2/9/2015, it was observed that the appeal is already abated as against respondent no.4. In fact the compensation has been awarded to the respondent no.4. No steps are taken as against respondent no.4. On the said date, counsel for appellant was absent. Matter was adjourned to 16/9/2015 as a last chance. Thereafter also, matter was adjourned to 28/9/2015. In fact when the appeal is abated against respondent no.4 i.e. the person to whom compensation has been awarded, nothing survives in the present appeal.
2] Today also none appears for the appellant. The Appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
[S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.]
umg/
Makrand Damodhar Apte
Minabai Damodhar Apte
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court