The Court allowed the Court Receiver's report by consent, discharging the Court Receiver due to non-lodgement of the petition and directing the petitioner to pay costs and charges.
Court Receiver discharged; petitioner to pay costs of receiver and report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
1
CRR-1-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO. 1 OF 2015
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 803 OF 2014
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited … Petitioner
Versus
Rushima Enterprises & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Vaishali Padale for the Petitioner.
Mr. N.A. Bandodkar, 2nd Assistant of the Court Receiver, present.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 14TH JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
“(a) Court Receiver be discharged in view of non-lodgment of Petition ;
(b) The cost, charges of Court Receiver may kindly be directed to be paid by the Petitioner payable to the office of the Court Receiver.
(c) Costs of this report in the sum of Rs.3000/- be recovered from the Petitioner, therein”.
Nitin
2 CRR-1-2015
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Rushima Enterprises & Ors.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
