Disposed
Nadeem Majid Oomerbhoy v. Rashid Sattar Oomerbhoy and Ors.
Bombay HCCRR/191/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
57-CRR-191-14.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO. 191 OF 2014
IN
SUIT NO. 4913 OF 2000
Nadeem Majid Oomergbhoy…Plaintiff
Versus
Rashid Sattar Oomberbhoy & Ors.…Defendants
Mr. Z. A. Jariwala, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Kevin Lewis, i/b Desai Desai Carrimjee & Mulla, for the
Defendant No. 1.
Mr. Rahul Singh, for the Defendants Nos. 2, 3, 4A and 4C.
Mr. Sailesh Thakkar, i/b S. Thakkar & Co., for the Defendants Nos.
7 and 8.
Mr. N. A. Bandodkar, IInd Assistant to Court Receiver, present.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 23rd February 2015
PC:-
1.Pursuant to the order dated 25th August 2014 since the
relevant records have been shifted from Sitram Building to Flat No.
301, Sliverton, Wodehouse Lane, Colaba, Mumbai, the 2nd, 3rd
and the terrace floors of Sitaram Building should now be made
available to MHADA for urgent structural works as required by
1 of 2
57-CRR-191-14.DOC
MHADA. The Court Receiver’s Report is made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (e).
2.It is clarified that there is a exclusive access way to the 2nd,
3rd and the terrace floors. Once the necessary repairs have been
carried out by MHADA, the Court Receiver must ensure that
possession of those premises which were in his custody including
the passage way must be taken back.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Nadeem Majid Oomergbhoy
Rashid Sattar Oomberbhoy
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court