Disposed
Naina Harish Shah and Ors. v. Dyaneshwar K.Kulkarni
Bombay HCCRR/12/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
66-CRR12-15.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO. 12 OF 2015
IN
SUIT NO. 711 OF 1994
Naina Harish Shah & Ors.…Plaintiffs
Versus
Dyaneshwar K. Kulkarni…Defendant
Ms. Naina H. Shah, Plaintiff No. 1 in person.
Ms. Seema Deshpande, Plaintiff No. 2 in person.
Mr. I.S. Yadav,for the Defendants.
Mr. K.K. Trivedi, Ist Assistant to Court Receiver.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:2nd February 2015
PC:-
1.The Defendants are represented. They have no objection to
an order in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Court
Receiver’s Report. The Court Receiver’s Report is made absolute
in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d). The costs to be deducted
from the amount lying in the Court Receiver’s Account.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Naina Harish Shah
Dyaneshwar K. Kulkarni
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court