Shri.Ravindra Shamba Teli.Presently in Sub Jail Sada, Thr.His Next Friend Shri.Deepak Monohar Matka Vs State of Goa through the Public Prosecutor, and Anr.

Heard Mr. Poulekar, the learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 279 and 304-A of Indian Penal Code, and has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 30 days (under Section 279 of I.P.C.), and to undergo simple imprisonment for one year (under Section 304-A of I.P.C.), and further directed to pay compensation of Rs.25,000/- to the legal heirs of the deceased, and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The said judgment and order has been confirmed in appeal.

¶13

It is submitted that the applicant was all along on bail and there are no allegations that he has misused the liberty. Considering the overall circumstances, the following order is passed :

¶14

CRMA/153/2015

¶15

2

¶16

: O r d e r :

¶17

i) The substantive sentence of imprisonment is hereby suspended, pending disposal of the criminal revision application, on condition of the applicant furnishing a P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/-, with one solvent surety in the like amount, before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, and further subject to the condition that the amount of compensation Rs.25,000/- is deposited before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa.

¶18

ii) Bail before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa.

¶19

iii) Parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order.

¶20

iv) The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶21

C. V. BHADANG, J.

¶22

ssk

Shri.Ravindra Shamba Teli.Presently in Sub Jail Sada, Thr.His Next Friend Shri.Deepak Monohar Matka v. State of Goa through the Public Prosecutor, and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri.Ravindra Shamba Teli.Presently in Sub Jail Sada, Thr.His Next Friend Shri.Deepak Monohar Matka v. State of Goa through the Public Prosecutor, and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Rakesh Kambli. Vs Mr. Ajit Tari and Anr.

Savita Satchit Uskaikar and 14 Ors., Vs Mithun Mauli Uskaikar.

Smt. Kusum Yeshwant Kamat and 2 Ors., Vs Smt. Shalini Sagoon Kamat through Her Constituted Attorney Smt. Padma Bhale

Mr. Francisco Xavier Dias and Anr. Vs Mrs. Olga Cabral and 24 Ors.

Mr. Damodar Vassant Parulekar and Anr., Vs Ravindra Vassant Parulekar and Anr.

M/S. Mohit Steel Industries. Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, CIRCLE-2 (1), Panaji.