Mr. Patil. Perusal of application shows that applicants did not challenge the order dated 04.09.2014 passed by the learned trial Jude framing preliminary issue. That apart, plaintiffs had issued notice on 20.10.2008. Though defendants No.1 to 6 received that notice, they did not give reply. Apart from that, before institution of the Suit, plaintiffs issued notice in the year 2013, and thereafter instituted the present Suit. Mr. Patil could not point out that after refusal of defendants No.1 to 6, plaintiffs did not institute Suit within 3 years from the date of refusal, and therefore, in view of Article 54, Suit is barred by limitation. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in this submission. The learned trial Judge will however consider this aspect at the time of deciding the Suit finally. Subject to that, Petition is dismissed.