came to his share. It appears that the Applicant's uncle one Harihar H. Mehta filed a Trust Petition No.4 of 1999 in this Court for revocation of the trust by challenging the family settlement and sought the transfer of the trust property mentioned in the family settlement. It appears that certain orders came to be passed in favour of the said Harihar Mehta, pursuant to which he addressed letters to the tenants of the building in question as Constituted Attorney of his aunt asking them to pay rent to him directly. Since the Respondent herein was according to the said Harihar Mehta in arrears of rent, a notice dated 4-7-2002 came to be addressed to him through advocate Dorajiwala by the said Harihar Mehta calling upon the Respondent herein to pay the arrears of rent. The Applicant it seems got wind of the said notices addressed by the said Harihar Mehta pursuant to which the Applicant filed a Trust Petition No.2 of 2002, wherein he sought to bring on record the factum of the Deed of Settlement which took place amongst the family members. In the said Trust Petition No.2 of 2002, the family settlement was upheld by this Court and the Applicant was declared as owner/landlord of the suit premises and the said Harihar Mehta was directed not to make any claim in respect of the suit premises.
