The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of Contempt Petition No. 46 of 2014 as withdrawn, since the petitioner sought to withdraw proceedings after the respondent had taken a decision on the alleged illegal construction matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CONTEMPT PETITION (MAIN) NO. 46 OF 2014
MRS. INGRID GOMES. ... Petitioner Versus SMT. RAJESHRI PARSEKAR AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents
Shri Jude Sequeira, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Shri V. Lobo, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:24th July, 2015
P.C:
The petitioner had alleged that respondent no. 4 had committed contempt of order dated 04.12.2013, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 225/2013. The direction was that the respondent no. 4-Panchayat, shall decide the matter of alleged illegal construction, in accordance with the provisions of law.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
CPM/46/2014
2
EV
MRS. INGRID GOMES
SMT. RAJESHRI PARSEKAR AND 3 ORS.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
