The petition filed under company law was withdrawn by the petitioner as payments were received after the motion. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and made no order as to costs.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2.cp.42.2004.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 42 OF 2004
Jaikishandas A. Wadhwa ...Petitioner vs Sun Earth Ceramics Ltd. ...Respondent.
Mr F Sayed a/w Bhumika Gada i/b Kukreja & Co. for the Petitioner Mr Jamshed Ansari for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
JUNE 30, 2015
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that as submitted by the Respondent in its affidavit dated 9 October 2013, the payments referred to in Memorandum of Understanding entered into between the parties on 30 April 2011 have been received by the Petitioner and seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
( S.C.GUPTE J. )
Pg 1 of 1
Jaikishandas A. Wadhwa
Sun Earth Ceramics Ltd.
S.C. Gup
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
