Contempt petition dismissed after the State respondent produced a communication showing the High Power Committee reviewed the petitioner's representation and communicated the decision on 06/06/2013.
No action initiated against the Respondents; Petition disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-343.13
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.343 OF 2013
Mr. Ramesh Ramchandra Badi … Petitioner Vs.
Principle Secretary, Law & Judiciary Department and Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5- State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 27th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
. The learned AGP tenders a copy of communication dated 14th June, 2013 issued by the Section Officer, Law and Judiciary Department of the State Government on record. A list of dates and events has been attached to the said communication which record that on the basis of the representation of the Petitioner of 29th April, 2013, a decision has been taken by the High Power Committee and that the same has been communicated to the Petitioner on 6th June, 2013. We accept the aforesaid statements. In view of the statements, it is not necessary to initiate any action against the Respondents. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of.
1 of 1
Mr. Ramesh Ramchandra Badi
Principle Secretary, Law & Judiciary Department and Ors.
A.S. Oka
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
