In a company petition, the High Court of Bombay accepted and recorded consent terms tendered by both parties and disposed of the petition accordingly, noting the petitioner's understanding of the English contents.
Petition disposed of in terms of Consent Terms marked 'X'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
1 / 1
1015-CP-250-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 250 OF 2015
Shri Ajitprasad @ Ajit Laxman Dixit … Petitioner Versus
Shreya Life Sciences Private Limited … Respondent
Ms. Smita Mhatre for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Panikar i/b. Ajay Law Associates for the Respondent. Petitioner present in person.
Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, Authorized Representative of the Respondent present in person.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 20TH APRIL, 2015
P.C.
The learned Advocates appearing for the Petitioner and the Respondent have tendered Consent Terms dated 20th April, 2015. They submit that the Consent Terms be taken on record and the above Petition be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Though the Petitioner has signed the Consent Terms in Marathi, he states that he understands English and he has understood the contents of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are signed by the Authorized Representative of the Respondent. The Consent Terms are also signed by the Advocates for the parties. The above Petition is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms marked 'X'.
Shri Ajitprasad @ Ajit Laxman Dixit
Shreya Life Sciences Private Limited
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
