The Bombay High Court dismissed a company appeal (No. 39 of 2014) and a related application (No. 37 of 2014) for want of prosecution, noting lack of representation by any party.
The Company Appeal and the associated Application were dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
956-COAPP-39-2014
Nitin
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2014
IN
CLB COMPANY PETITION NO. 76 OF 2012
Shri Rajesh G. Uchil and Anr.
… Appellants
Versus
M/s. Trikon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. … Respondents
ALONG WITH
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2014
IN
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2014
IN
CLB COMPANY PETITION NO. 76 OF 2012
None for the Appellants. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2015
P.C.
None for the parties. In view thereof, the above Appeal as well
as the Application are dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Shri Rajesh G. Uchil and Anr.
M/s. Trikon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
