Anju Timblo., v. Dilip Timblo and 11 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Goa disposed of Company Application No. 138 of 2015 as dismissed without any substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2015
IN
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2015
ANJU TIMBLO., ... Applicant Versus DILIP TIMBLO AND 11 ORS., ... Respondents
Shri Rafiq Dada, Senior Advocate with Shri Gurudutt Mallya, Shri Aashdin Chivalwala and Ms. Daksha Lotlikar, Advocates for the Appellant.
Shri Joseph Kodian Thara, Senior Advocate with Shri Eric Coriea and Shri Rohit Bras de Sa, Advocates for the Respondent no.1.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:6th August, 2015
P.C.
In view of dismissal of Company Appeal No.1/2015, this application does not survive and is, accordingly, disposed of.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
ANJU TIMBL
DILIP TIMBL
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court