The High Court allowed the amendment of the writ petition. The court held that the amendment deserved to be allowed in view of averments made in the supporting affidavit and made the chamber summons absolute.
Chamber summons made absolute to permit amendment of the writ petition to be carried out within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CHS-85-15
1
asn
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.85 OF 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2373 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr. P.J.Thorat for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Mahadik for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
C.V.BHADANG,JJ.
DATE : APRIL 21,2015.
P.C.
.Heard learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner in support of the chamber
summons. The applicant is the writ
petitioner. We have heard the learned
counsel appearing for the respondents.
The prayer is for permitting amendment
of the writ petition on the basis of
the subsequent events. In view of the
averments made in the affidavit in
support, the amendment deserves to be
allowed. Accordingly, the chamber
summons is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a). Amendment to be
carried out within four weeks from
today.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition deserves to be allowed to be amended on the basis of subsequent events.
Whether the chamber summons for permitting amendment should be made absolute.
The Applicant/Petitioner
The Respondents
A.S.OKA
C.V.BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court