Pratibha D. Vaidya v. Vishwanandan a. Agaskar
Case brief
What is this about?
Chamber order allowing amendment of petitioner's name due to death disposed of as superseded.
What did the court decide?
Disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-TS74-02+.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 74 OF 2002
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 31 OF 2002
WITH
CHAMBER ORDER (L) NO. 161 OF 2015 AND
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 73 OF 2002
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 758 OF 2001
Pratibha D. Vaidya
Versus
Vishwanandan A. Agaskar
…Plaintiff
…Defendant
Mr. V.J. Shah, i/b M/s. MMK Law Associates, for the Applicant.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:26th June 2015
PC:-
1.There is a pending Chamber Order (L) No. 161 of 2015
pending since March. It seeks a minor amendment to the Petition /
plaint to delete the name of the original Plaintiff / Petitioner and to
1 of 2
4-TS74-02+.DOC
substitute the name of the Applicant, Vanita Abhay Kirtikar, as also
consequential amendments. The original Plaintiff has passed away.
The present Applicant is another beneficiary. This being a Petition
for Letters for Administration with Will annexed, there can be no
possible objection to the application.
2.Leave to amend in terms of the schedule to the Chamber
Order. Amendment to be carried out, without need of re-
verification, on or before 13th July 2015. Amended copy of the
Petition to be served on the Advocate for the Defendant on or
before 20th July 2015.
3. List the Suit for directions on 21st July 2015 on the supplementary board.
4. In view of this, the Chamber Order (L) No. 161 of 2015 does not survive and is disposed of.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Pratibha D. Vaidya
Vishwanandan A. Agaskar
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court