Taluka Sangrampur Buddhavihar Samiti and 1. v. State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue Dept. Mumbai and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0104caz100.14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
C.A.Z.NO. 100/2014 IN L.P.A.NO. 40/2001 IN W.P.NO. 3155/1999.
Taluka Sangrampur Buddhavihar Samiti
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & S.B.SHUKRE, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 01, 2015.
Heard Shri S.J. Khandalkar, learned counsel for applicant/appellant and Mrs. K.Deshpande, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Other respondents have not filed any reply, though period of more than 4 months have expired. 2. In this situation, as subsequent events are sought to be brought on record, leave to amend is granted. The same shall be without prejudice to the rights of respondents to raise all such contentions as are available to them in law.
Order
0104caz100.14
2
within a period of two weeks from today. Liberty to respondents to carry out consequential amendment thereafter within a further period of four weeks.
of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Taluka Sangrampur Buddhavihar Samiti
State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharadhikari
S.B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court