Allowed

Maharashtra Rajya Shikshak Sena (Primary),District Branch,Thr. Working President, Tushar P. Anjanka v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary Ministry of Education, Mumbai and 4 Others

Bombay HC5 May 2015CAW/878/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a civil application seeking transfer of an assistant teacher from Panchayat Samiti, Umrer to Panchayat Samiti, Saoner under the HusbandWife Unification Scheme, directing respondents to consider the claim.

What did the court decide?

The civil application was allowed directing respondents 3 and 4 to consider the applicant's claim for transfer from Panchayat Samiti, Umrer to Panchayat Samiti, Saoner on the post of Assistant Teacher

Maharashtra Rajya Shikshak Sena (Primary),District… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

1 05.05.caw.878.15.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION(W) NO. 878/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4615/2014 ( maharashtra Rajya Shikshan Sena (Primary) Dist.Branch, Nagpur vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶5

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr.P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner/applicant Mr. N.s.Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents 1 ,2 and 5 Mr. Sheikh Majid, Advocate for respondent no. 3 and 4

¶7

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

¶8

DATED : 5^th May, 2015.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

Shri P.S. Kshrisagar, the learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is ready to work on the post of Assistant Teacher, on which she is reverted as she would like to avail the benefit of the policy of seeking transfer under the HusbandWife Unification Scheme. It is stated that in view of the order of status quo, as granted by this Court, the respondent-Zilla Parishad is not considering the claim of the applicant for seeking transfer from

¶11

2 05.05.caw.878.15.

¶12

Panchayat Samiti, Umrer to Panchayat Samiti, Saoner.

¶13

In the circumstances of the case, the respondent nos. 3 and 4 may consider the claim of the applicant for transfer from Panchayat Samiti, Umrer to Panchayat Samiti, Saoner, on the post of Assistant Teacher.

¶14

Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of.

¶15

JUDGEJUDGE

¶16

sahare

Maharashtra Rajya Shikshak Sena (Primary),District Branch,Thr. Working President, Tushar P. Anjanka v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary Ministry of Education, Mumbai and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra Rajya Shikshak Sena (Primary),District Branch,Thr. Working President, Tushar P. Anjanka v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary Ministry of Education, Mumbai and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sau. Shama Ravindra Kalbande Vs Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and Anothers

Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur and Ors.

Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur and Others

Ashok Ramrao Thakur, Buldhana Vs Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claim, Amravati

Ulhas S/O Kashirao Kale Vs State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Amravati and 2 Others

Bapurao Shamrao Thote Vs Registrar General and Stamp Controller, State of Maharashtra, Pune and 2 Others