Allowed

Arvind Ganesh Paranjape (Since Decd) Thorugh Lrs. and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Feb 2015CAW/521/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bharuch Special Civil Application Court allowed the Civil Application. The court ordered the petition to be treated as a Fresh Admission case and directed final decision at the admission stage within two weeks, with parties final notice.

What did the court decide?

Petition placed under 'Fresh Admission'; endeavour to decide finally at admission stage; action to be completed within two weeks.

Arvind Ganesh Paranjape (Since Decd) Thorugh Lrs. and… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

caw-521.14

¶3

ash

¶4

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.521 OF 2014 IN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.6424 OF 2012

¶7

Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.

¶8

Shri Pankaj Das for the Petitioner. Mrs. Neha Bhide, AGP “B” Panel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri Rakesh R. Bhatkar for Respondent No.3.

¶9

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K.MENON, JJ DATED : 5TH FEBRUARY 2015

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

. Heard the learned AGP for the First and

¶12

Second Respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the Third Respondent. In view of the averments made in the Application, the same is allowed in terms of the prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.

¶13

 2caw-521.14

¶14

ash

¶15

Place the Petition under the caption of “Fresh Admission” on 10^th March 2015.

¶16

The parties are put to notice that an endeavour shall be made to decide the Petition finally at the stage of admission.

Arvind Ganesh Paranjape (Since Decd) Thorugh Lrs. and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Ganesh Paranjape (Since Decd) Thorugh Lrs. and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sou Mathurabai Bhausaheb Thorat Sevabhavi Trust Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

M/S. Colour Tech Coating (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Smt. Sundar Madhav Mandal Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

M/S. Gangamai Industries and Constructions Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Hindustan Breweries and Bottling Ltd. Vs the Commissioner State Excise and Ors.

Gopal Pamnani Vs State of Maharashtra, through Dept of Industries and Ors.