In a chamber hearing, the court considered the delay in filing a Review Petition. Finding the delay acceptable based on the averments, the court condoned the delay and allowed the Civil Application.
Delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned; Civil Application is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dgm 1
chamber matter db - caw-358-15 in
rpwst-24593-14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2015
(FOR DELAY) IN
RPWST / 24593 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 11405 OF 2012
K. N. Bhise Arts and Commerce College, through Principal Dr. R.R. Patil
.... Petitioner
vs
Kamalakar Dagdu Narkhede & ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Dilip Bodake with Mr. S.T. Bhosale for the petitioner. Mr. A.I.Patel, AGP for RespondentsState.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : February 13, 2015 (IN CHAMBER)
P.C.:
Heard.
out, the delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned.
3 Civil Application is allowed accordingly.
(M. S. SONAK,J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the Review Petition should be condoned given the averments made.
K. N. Bhise Arts and Commerce College, through Principal Dr. R.R. Patil
Kamalakar Dagdu Narkhede & ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
