The Court condoned a 26-day delay in filing a review petition by accepting the reasons provided by the applicants, treating them as sufficient under Section 11 of the Limitation Act.
The delay of 26 days in filing the review petition is condoned. The review petition is listed for hearing after two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.03.2015
CAW-329-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.329 OF 2015
IN
REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.326 OF 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8750 OF 2014
Narain Hingorani and another .. Applicants Versus Harish Kishinchand Chandnani .. Respondent
Ms. Kavita A. Shah, for the Applicants. Shri. H. K. Chandnani Respondent in person.
CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 09th MARCH, 2015
P.C.
1. The above Civil Application has been filed for seeking condonation of delay of 26 days in filing the above Review Petition. The reasons therefor are mentioned in paragraph 3 of the Civil Application. The Respondent Shri. Harish Kishinchand Chandnani appears in person. He opposes the application. However, ultimately submits to the orders of the Court. Hence, accepting the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application the same is allowed. Resultantly, the delay of 26 days in filing the Review Petition stands condoned. List the Review Petition for hearing after two weeks. The above Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.
[R.M. SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
BGP .
Narain Hingorani and another
Harish Kishinchand Chandnani
R.M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court