HIGH COURT
Amendment to be carried out during the course of the day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06022015cawno.258.2015 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application (W) No. 258 of 2015 in W.P.No. St. 23978 of 2014
Purushottam Sardarsingh Salokh vs. State of Maharashtra and others.
Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders.
Ms R.D.Raskar, Adv. for petitioner.
CORAM: B.R.GAVAI &
MRS. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 6.2.2015
For the reasons stated in the application, the
application is allowed.
Amendment to be carried out during the course of
the day.
Writ Petition No. 631 of 2015:
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that though the petitioner has challenged the order of invalidating the caste claim of the petitioner, the petitioner is restricting the claim in the petition only for protection for his service.
Hence, issue notice for final disposal returnable on
27.2.2015.
06022015cawno.258.2015 2
Mr, K.L.Dharmadhikari, learned AGP waives notice for R-1 and 2. Mr. Mishra, Adv. waives notice for R-3 and 4.
JUDGE JUDGE
patle
Purushottam Sardarsingh Salokh
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Mrs. Mridula R. Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
