The applicant withdrew the civil application made in a writ petition, stating that the respondents were formal parties. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application.
Civil application allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23.10.2015
CAW-220-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.220 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7210 OF 2012
Shri. Pranjeevan D. Rawal .. Applicant Versus Kanwar Ajitsingh Deol and others .. Respondents
Shri. Roshan S. Tanna, for the Applicant.
CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 23rd OCTOBER, 2015
P.C.
1. The Learned Counsel for the Applicant Shri. Roshan S. Tanna states that the Applicant would not press the above Civil Application in view of the fact that the Respondents against whom the Petition has been dismissed are only formal parties in the context of the challenge raised in the above Petition. Hence, the Civil Application is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
[R.M. SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
BGP .
Shri. Pranjeevan D. Rawal
Kanwar Ajitsingh Deol
R.M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court