C.A. in Writ Petition dismissed; prayer not granted as no case made out for indulgence following earlier dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
caw.2052.2014_40.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2052 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7850 OF 2008
Abdul hameed Ab. Khalique & Ors. ... Applicants
Vs.
The Malegaon Municipal Corporation & anr. ... Respondents
Mr.Raees Ahmed Abdul Hameed, Power of Attorney holder of the petitioner present
CORAM: MRS.VASANTI A. NAIK & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: 9th MARCH, 2015
P.C.:
After the order of withdrawal of the writ petition dated 15.1.2010 was recalled by the order dated 21.12.2011, this Court again heard the matter on 24.1.2012 and dismissed the writ petition on the ground that no case was made out for indulgence.
In this background, on a perusal of the writ petition and the orders passed therein, the prayer made in the application cannot be granted. Civil application stands rejected.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 / 1
Abdul hameed Ab. Khalique & Ors.
The Malegaon Municipal Corporation & anr.
Vasanti A. Naik
Mrudula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
