This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW20-15
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO.20/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4264/2014 (D)
(ANAMIKA SADASHIV BARGAT & OTHERS VERSUS N.M.C., NAGPUR & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2015.
The learned counsel for the applicants states that in view of the subsequent development, the application has been rendered infructuous.
The civil application stands disposed of as such.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
ANAMIKA SADASHIV BARGAT
N.M.C., NAGPUR
B.R. GAVAI
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
