The applicant sought extension of retirement age. The High Court found that the State Government had approved the proposal after the filing of the application, rendering the purpose of the application served. The application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dgm 1 907caw159414 in wp236514.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1594 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2365 OF 2014
Dr. Sou. Meera Chandrashekhar Ramnavmiwale ….Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ….Respondents. (Orig. Respondents)
Mr. V.A. Shastry for the Applicant. Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. P. N. Joshi with Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the Respondent No.5.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE : 23.01.2015
P.C.:
It is informed to the Court by the learned counsel for the Respondent No.5University that the proposal of the Petitioner was sent through the University to the State Government for extension of the retirement age of the applicant from 62 years to 65 years. It is stated that the State Government has approved the proposal in respect of the applicant on 21.1.2015. It is stated that the purpose of filing the Civil Application stands served due to the subsequent development.
1/2
dgm 2 907caw159414 in wp236514.sxw
Shri Shastri, the learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute
the factual position.
In view of the aforesaid, the Civil Application stands disposed of.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
2/2
Dr. Sou. Meera Chandrashekhar Ramnavmiwale
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
