Dismissed

Addvision Outdoor Advertising Agency, through Partner, Sangram Chandrakant Dubal v. the Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Pandharpur and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Oct 2015CAW/1296/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Mumbai disposed of the withdrawn writ petition with liberty to apply for remedies under the Municipal Acts. The ad-interim relief was extended until November 25, 2015, pending decision by the Revisional Authority.

What did the court decide?

The ad-interim relief granted on August 1, 2013 is extended to operate till November 25, 2015.

Addvision Outdoor Advertising Agency, through… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2015)

wp6751

ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6751 OF 2013 WITH
 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1296 OF 2014.

¶5

Addvision Outdoor Advertising
Agency ...Petitioner
vs.
The Chief Officer,
Municipal Council,
Pandharpur & Ors. ...Respondents

¶6

Mr.Pratap Patil for the Petitioner
Mr.Sarang S. Aradhye for the respondent Nos.1 and 2
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for respondent No.3
Mr.S.P.Rajepandhare i/b Mr.A.A.Joshi for respondent
Nos.4 and 5.

¶7

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
 V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ.
 DATE : OCTOBER 9, 2015

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

1The order dated 20th May 2015 passed by the
Regional Director of Municipal Administration in
accordance with sub-section 4 of section 308 of the
Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats
and Industrial Townships Act,1965 was placed on
record by the learned AGP on 25th August 2015. The
learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions
states that the petitioner was never served with a
copy of the said order and the petitioner received
the same only on 25th August 2015 when the same was
submitted by the learned AGP.

¶10

2The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

¶11

2 wp6751

¶12

permission to withdraw this writ petition with
liberty to avail of the remedy under section 318 of
the said Act. He seeks continuation of ad-interim
relief granted on 1st August 2013. The learned
counsel for the Municipal Council submits that the
present status of the hoardings is not brought on
record.

¶13

3The ad-interim order of this Court dated 1st
August 2013 is operative till today. The same
deserves to be extended without prejudice to the
rights and contentions of the parties to enable the
petitioner to move the Revisional Authority.

¶14

4Accordingly, we pass the following order:

¶15

(I)Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for;

¶16

(II)To enable the petitioner to adopt the
remedy, ad-interim relief granted by this Court
on 1st August 2013 shall continue to operate
till 25th November 2015;

¶17

(III)ConcernedAuthorityexercisingthe
revisional powers shall decide the Revision
Application and the application for interim
relief made therein without being influenced by
the ad-interim order dated 1st August 2013 and
further continuation thereof;

¶18

(IV)All contentions of the parties are kept
open;

¶19

(V)There will be no order as to costs;

¶20

3 wp6751

¶21

(VI) Civil Application No.1296 of 2014 does not survive and the same is disposed of.

¶22

(V.L.ACHLIYA,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Addvision Outdoor Advertising Agency, through Partner, Sangram Chandrakant Dubal v. the Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Pandharpur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Addvision Outdoor Advertising Agency, through Partner, Sangram Chandrakant Dubal v. the Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Pandharpur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Parmeshwar Chandrasa Kumbhar Vs the Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum, New Delhi and Ors.

Saroj Babubhai Kapadiya and Ors. Vs Nashik Muncipal Corporation and Ors.

Nandvijay C.H.S. Ltd. Vs the Administrator Nandvijay C.H.S. Ltd., and Ors.

Anil Raut and 7 Others Vs D N Nagar Mamta Co-Operative Hsg Ltd. and 5 Others

Kamla Real Estate Hub Private Ltd. Vs Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Pankaj Rach and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Other