The Court disposed of a civil application filed in a writ petition. A request to restrain the Bank from taking possession was rejected as the underlying writ petition was disposed, and the application did not survive. Liberty was granted to file a fresh petition.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(CAW 1056 of 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1056 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION No. 1707 OF 2015
M/s.Zenith Computers Ltd. ...Petitioners/Applicants Vs.
Indian Bank …Respondent
Mr.Nitin Thakkar, Senior Counsel i/b. Kaikini Phadke and Associates for Petitioners/Applicants
Mr.Dharam Sharma a/w. Uma Sharma i/b. Dharam & Co. for Respondent
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S.SONAK, J.J.
DATE : APRIL 21, 2015
P.C. :
[M.S. SONAK, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
M/s. Zenith Computers Ltd.
Indian Bank
V. M. KANADE
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
