High Court single judge dismissed the single applicant's petition as abated, holding that the sole appellant had expired over 90 days prior with no response from legal heirs.
None; application dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpa 1/1 cas-602-09.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.602 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO.2178 OF 2009
Smt.Shashikala V. Pawar … Applicant Versus Dattatraya S. Lohar & Ors. … Respondents
Mr.Vishwanath S. Talkute, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.Mahesh Rawool i/b. Mr.K.B. Sonwalkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : RAVI K. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED : JUNE 26, 2015.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the sole appellant has expired prior to 90 days and he is not getting any response from the legal heirs of the appellant. Hence, the matter is dismissed as abated.
(RAVI K. DESHPANDE, J.)
Smt. Shashikala V. Pawar
Dattatraya S. Lohar & Ors.
RAVI K. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
